Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bombcar 1377 days ago
The semi-snide comments from the Boom side is, as the kids would say, "sus".
2 comments

Yeah that struck me as odd; it's unprofessional and weak; I think it's a very bad sign for the future of the company.
Wait... does anyone believe they have a future? How?

If this was doable and there was a market for it, what on earth would stop Boeing and Airbus from building one with 1000x more experience in designing and above all manufacturing airframes. (Airbus even has the inherited legacy of Concorde through Aerospatiale/Sud Aviation)

> If this was doable and there was a market for it, what on earth would stop Boeing and Airbus

Boing and Airbus have lots of things to choose from to focus their (large, but still limited) resources on. Even if they think it is doable and has a market, they'd probably also think that improving what they have is less risky and a bigger market.

I don't know, but it's certainly the first question every investor asked, so we can assume they have (or at least had) a pretty good answer, no?
I know some people involved in Boom. They simply have no understanding of the physical limitations of supersonic flight. Surprise, they’re all software engineers.
And supersonic flight is really a hardware / physics / materials science problem than a software one. (again: see Concorde)
haha right?

"Boom meanwhile added, “We are appreciative of Rolls-Royce’s work over the last few years but have mutually concluded their proposed engine design and legacy business model is not the best option for Overture’s future airline operators or passengers.”

ssssssnap!

They should partner with a jet engine startup that has produced nothing but renders to match their business model.
“Legacy business model” = ???
Making money
Yeah everyone these days is saying

"OK, first we have very nice policies generous no-questions refunds, get a good word going. Then traction, then investment. Then, revenues, it's revenues all the way, growth man. And then you get a good multiplier on revenues because we can say we're tech for some fucked up reason. Like coupla degrees here n there some PhD's (this is why there's big-name university focus, there's better PhD's in Georgia Tech, but it's marketing) maybe then we can say it. Then...liquidity event. Then just juggle forever."

Specifically, making money by making products, rather than grifting investors.
= Actually making engines?