|
|
|
|
|
by aoanla
1383 days ago
|
|
The difficulty with this argument is what we mean by "quality". It's tautological to state that hierarchies select for "qualities that enable you to be higher on the hierarchy"; it's much more debatable as to the nature of those qualities (and, indeed, that the existence of the hierarchy itself doesn't change the fitness surface, so that the advantageous qualities are different to what they might have been without it). See, eg, the amount of energy antlered deer (especially males) expend on having large, healthy antlers, purely to compete with other male deer. "Having large antlers" is a "quality" that has very little adaptive value outside of the conditions created by the fact of a hierarchy itself. |
|
Deers have antlers for reasons other than competing with other deer. To defend themselves from predators.
Since they have them, they use them to settle differences in quality. In this case, quality of self-defence.