|
|
|
|
|
by Geee
1402 days ago
|
|
The driver has to be liable, until the L5 system has lower error-rate than a human. For regulatory and liability reasons, it should be registered as an L2 until it's perfect. No one has ever claimed that FSD is a finished product. |
|
Which that was promised to be completed in 2020. Where are the Level 5 robotaxis that Elon was confident enough to release by that year?
> For regulatory and liability reasons, it should be registered as an L2 until it's perfect.
And FSD was advertised as Level 5 by Tesla and was due to be complete by 2020 deadline. Even before that, many customers fell for this and were promised that future updates would eventually make it Level 5.
See how the scam works? Not only it was meant to be 'Level 5' as advertised by 2020, Tesla knew that it won't get there all along and continued the deception as their fans bought into the false promise and customers realised that they are paying for a broken contraption that didn't function as advertised and will continue paying for it as the price keeps increasing.
> No one has ever claimed that FSD is a finished product.
Yes. Elon (and Tesla) were the only ones that claimed and promised that it will be finished with robo-taxis on the road, at Level 5 FSD by 2020. This is the pied-piper scam and they have sold a false promise to their loyal fanbase and they will pay for an unfinished product until its 'perfect Level 5 FSD'; whenever that is and will continue to raise prices.
I also don't think it is ok to use unfinished safety critical software on the roads and put many driver's on the roads lives at risk.