|
|
|
|
|
by jfasi
1399 days ago
|
|
I’m about as far from a crypto defender as you can get, but I think this page misses the point. If El Salvador is planning to use Bitcoin as a medium of exchange, which by all accounts they are, their being “up” or “down” must be measured by the size of the economic activity that Bitcoin allowed them to facilitate. That figure is harder to get at. Viewed this way, the additional purchases which seem foolish and laughable might even be signs of success: perhaps Bitcoin business is booming so hard they need to expand their reserves? To be clear, I highly doubt that’s the case here, but if we’re going to assess success we should at least try to steelman their position. There’s plenty to mock about this change without taking cheap shots. |
|
San Salvador has less than three months' imports in reserves [3][4][5]. Their Bitcoin experiment has scared off crisis lenders [6]. There is no good ending for them right now.
[1] https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/crypto-crash-leaves-e...
[2] https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/SLVBCAGDPBP6
[3] https://tradingeconomics.com/el-salvador/imports
[4] https://tradingeconomics.com/el-salvador/foreign-exchange-re...
[5] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BN.CAB.XOKA.CD?location...
[6] https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2022/02/15/cf-el-salvad...