|
|
|
|
|
by Nomentatus
1415 days ago
|
|
But compare and contrast the Iraq-Iran war, etc - aircraft were eaten up on both sides rather quickly. Note too that fighter pilots are rarer and actually more expensive (to train properly) than the jets IIRC. We haven't had a lot of fairly even struggles in the decades since. Russia was expected to overwhelm Ukraine in a real fight. The War in Vietnam might support your argument, a flood not just of planes but plenty of Russian pilots to secretly fly them kept the Vietnamese air force not just in the fight but quite successful. |
|
There's no sane military doctrine which uses your worst equipment first in a lighting strike, or 5 months later. This says to me that the truly horrendously awful state of their equipment and supply logistics is not some cunning plan. They can still win, but it's not the war he wanted. The longer it goes on, the more Russia digs itself into an economic hole, and attrition will tell on voters.