[Silhouette]

One problem with daily meetings is that the two of you are making reasonable and yet incompatible arguments here. You can't have a meeting at the same time every day that is both conveniently out of the way for those who want large blocks of time free for real work and conveniently in the middle of likely working times for those who prefer flexibility.

Personally I think the solution to this is obvious and apparently so do many others here. Daily standups within a mostly stable and well-functioning team are almost always redundant at best and actively disruptive at worst. So don't have daily standups. Instead work on a culture where people communicate freely whenever they need to and you bring people together for larger and longer meetings when (and only when) you have a specific reason for that.

[schlowmo]

You're right and I agree with your proposed solution. Having no (useless) dailies at all is even better than having them midday. But I'm fighting an uphill battle here, especially as freelancer.

I'm always a bit amused when Product Owners are suprised that there's nothing to clarify at a daily since the team is constantly transparent towards each other about blockers etc.

[Silhouette]

But I'm fighting an uphill battle here, especially as freelancer.

True. Whenever I've done freelance/consultancy stuff in the past my rule has been that if a client invites feedback then I'll test the water once. If they're receptive I'll elaborate. Otherwise I'll usually drop any process-related feedback and fit in as well as I reasonably can with everyone else since IME that is normally the most effective way to work in that kind of environment. It's always a bit disappointing if you can see a client making obvious mistakes and you know how to fix them but sometimes it happens and if they're not interested in changing then ultimately that's their decision and their responsibility.