Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by csdvrx 1461 days ago
So many cool things were pioneered in the 80s!

Why can't we make a better one receiving FTA DTV and showing it on an OLED screen?

2 comments

Probably because no one wants it.
I'd want one, even if it was black and white.
Well, no-one else but you does.
I do too
Because while you won't need an external unit for the tuner anymore, you would still need one for the battery.
This isn't true.

Smartwatches have had full HD h.264 and 720p h.265 hardware decode since at least 2014.

https://www.slideshare.net/jjwu6266/qualcomm-snapdragon-400b...

They do, but how many viewing hours do you get from a single battery charge?
The decoding is probably in the same order of magnitude as listening to music from your watch.

The screen brightness is the limiting factor. Based on always-on displays on the Apple Watch you are probably looking at 8 hours or so?

So decoding with the screen on might be 5 hours?

The always-on display drops power usage by being quite dim and reducing the update frequency to 1 Hz. 24-60 Hz video will draw way more power
Why would it need more battery than any smartwatch?
Decoding video is a power intensive operation. DTV broadcasts use modern codecs like H.264, H.265, and MPEG-2.
Display also drains battery when playing a video. Recent displays for smart watch have low power mode when the content is not changed.
With proper hardware decoding it should be less power intensive than using aarch64.