Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by UkrainianJew 1461 days ago
Because while you won't need an external unit for the tuner anymore, you would still need one for the battery.
2 comments

This isn't true.

Smartwatches have had full HD h.264 and 720p h.265 hardware decode since at least 2014.

https://www.slideshare.net/jjwu6266/qualcomm-snapdragon-400b...

They do, but how many viewing hours do you get from a single battery charge?
The decoding is probably in the same order of magnitude as listening to music from your watch.

The screen brightness is the limiting factor. Based on always-on displays on the Apple Watch you are probably looking at 8 hours or so?

So decoding with the screen on might be 5 hours?

The always-on display drops power usage by being quite dim and reducing the update frequency to 1 Hz. 24-60 Hz video will draw way more power
Why would it need more battery than any smartwatch?
Decoding video is a power intensive operation. DTV broadcasts use modern codecs like H.264, H.265, and MPEG-2.
Display also drains battery when playing a video. Recent displays for smart watch have low power mode when the content is not changed.
With proper hardware decoding it should be less power intensive than using aarch64.