|
|
|
|
|
by giaour
1467 days ago
|
|
I don't think the linked Politifact article supports your point: > The FBI considers anyone who has been arrested on a felony charge to have a criminal record, even if the arrest did not lead to a conviction. The FBI only counts those with a misdemeanor if a state agency asks the bureau to keep it on file. > So by the FBI’s standard, 73.5 million people in the United States had a criminal record as of June 30[, 2017]. The arrest warrants you mention from Texas would only count if failure to pay a parking ticket is a felony in TX |
|
The FBI might not keep track of unpaid parking tickets in Texas as part of their own criminal record database, but Texas does keep unpaid parking tickets on record for their own criminal background check:
https://texas.staterecords.org/criminal.php
As that site points out, any arrest or warrant for arrest even for a misdemeanor will be recorded in a criminal background check.
Different government agencies have different standards for what goes into a criminal record so that there is no such thing as one single unambiguous definition for what a criminal record is. Consequently most people, including hiring managers, or people on Hacker News shocked that 70 million people have such a record, may misinterpret what a criminal record means, what the implications of one are and how serious having one is.
There is no harm in pointing out to people that a criminal record, in and of itself, does not mean that someone is guilty of a criminal offense or even that they're guilty of something serious. It could be something benign like an unpaid parking ticket or someone was arrested who turned out to be entirely innocent.