|
|
|
|
|
by pbhjpbhj
1467 days ago
|
|
But not intrinsically, if it was stolen then you could just use the image to mint a new NFT, declare the other one as stolen -- maybe make an affidavit, or use some legal instrument -- then you've "unstolen" it. They're choosing to consider it as non-fungible, continuing that choice in order to deny yourself legal use of your property is not just drinking the cool-aid but bathing in it too. Of course this could be intentional, as others have said, it furthers the narrative that NFTs are genuinely non-fungible. |
|
At which point they're open to theft charges.
Bathing in kool aid indeed.