Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by idoh 1476 days ago
This is a bit wild, but learning and being fluid in MECE changed my life. Not really, but it really helped me in interviews and all types of conversations. Check out How to be MECE on Youtube. MECE = mutually exhaustive and completely exclusive.

The short version is that when you describe something you want to divide it up into mutually exclusive and completely exhaustive chunks. There are five ways to be MECE - algebraic, process, conceptual, segmenting, and opposite words (in descending priority of insight).

For example, if you are asked a question about how increase revenue for a grocery store, then you break it down into revenue = number of tickets * value per ticket, and then you can attack it that way. This would be the algebraic way to be MECE.

Trick A is that almost all conversations can be broken into MECE, and that gives good practice. E.g. if you are planning a road trip then when you are talking about it you use a process MECE to add structure.

Trick B is that it takes about an hour or two to be fluid in applying MECE to a given domain, just start picking random topics and breaking them down, and the more insightful the better. E.g. how would you describe the items on a menu? Different programming languages? Features you worked on?

If you do that, then it gives a proper narrative, good structure, and you can use the time where you are setting up the structure to think about everything else. By running through all items in the MECE list it shows that you are thorough and you have literally thought of everything (because you've created an exhaustive list).

2 comments

Mutually exclusive and comprehensively exhaustive.

That’s just pedantic — great write up!

Turns out, we were both wrong, it is "collectively" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MECE_principle
That's what I get for looking at the first google result: https://www.google.com/search?q=mece+acronym
> fluid

Fluent?

Fluid as in able to easily apply MECE to conversations. I guess being fluid with the application of MECE will lead to more fluent conversations. They both have the same latin root.

edit - updated the GP to make it clear that I was talking about being fluid in applying MECE to a given domain, which could be written or oral.

OK, cool, thanks—I wasn't asking to nitpick, but because I really wasn't sure whether it was a mistake, or a neologistic/jargon usage I was unfamiliar with.
Even if you were nitpicking then that's OK. On Hacker News we critique the words and not the person, right?