|
|
|
|
|
|
by ghshephard
1483 days ago
|
|
|
You also wrote: The need to warm up new IP's has existed for a while and a lot of providers do it. Any postmaster with experience knows how and why it's done.
I think the point people are trying to make, and I'm sympathetic to, is that if an ultra-low volume email poster, with a full-set of SPF DKIM and DMARC credentials configured and zero history of sending spam - that the majors (Yahoo/Google/Microsoft) could start off by not sending email from that domain immediately to spam, just because it isn't a well established and trusted IP address.Alternatively - come up with something akin to D&B registration system so people can attest that they won't engage in spammy behavior. |
|
|
Yes, and I'm saying what's the prequisite for that to happen. As long as it's okay (which it currently is) to send unsigned mail, IP addresses have larger weight. DKIM needs more deployment for that to change.
There's absolutely no way that IP-based reputation schemes will be deprecated before alternatives are viable. Sure it would be nice for a few people here, but no, won't happen before the ecosystem improves.
> Alternatively - come up with something akin to D&B registration system so people can attest that they won't engage in spammy behavior.
Already exists. That too gets abused.