|
|
|
|
|
by shrimpx
1496 days ago
|
|
That definition is incomplete. It makes it sound like you have to be constantly moving funds around to time the market, vs "buy and hold". But you can certainly time the market using "buy and hold", by waiting for the right moment to buy. And even if you buy "asap", you're still employing a market-timing strategy, that "buying asap is better than buying later". Dollar-cost averaging is a form of timing the market, because you're effectively reasoning that fixed-interval purchase will fare better than lump sump or other strategies. You're still predicting market behavior. Good resource: https://youtu.be/w_aOERmUWdA |
|
Yes that is timing the market because you wait for a certain time point, as opposed to just buy once you have enough liquidity.
> Dollar-cost averaging is a form of timing the market
No it’s not. It’s like saying passive is a form of active investment because some group of people pick the stocks that come into an index. Timing the market is betting on a given change, while dollar cost averaging is based on empirical analysis and is independent of the events the investor thinks will happen.
I mean the difference is actually simple and clear. One investor is telling “I bet something will happen soon“, the other “I have no idea what will happen”. It could hardly be more clear cut.