| Warning: There are a couple people in this thread mentioning products that they're investors in. I won't call them out expressly, but I think people should be direct about their incentive alignments. It's disingenuous and borders on astroturfing IMO. Background: Founder of Railway.app here. There's a lot of these companies popping up that offer a "Heroku replacement", and once you dive in, you realize you have to pay $300/mo for a Kubecluster + $200/mo for the wrapped Kube service In our experience, people move off Heroku for a couple things: - Cost: Kinda self explanatory but Heroku pricing ramps hard - Flexibility: Heroku's not great for anything beyond stateful monoliths - Scalability: Notoriously Heroku's SLAs aren't that great In my mind, you don't replace Heroku with a minimum $500/mo Kubernetes cluster. Not only is this cost prohibitively expensive, but Kubernetes itself is a jet engine, and if you're not trained to use it correctly, you can risk catastrophic failure (on costs ballooning, on dataloss, etc) We're working hard at Railway to provide not just a Heroku replacement, but a next generation, composable infrastructure canvas. $5/mo, 30 seconds, and you're up and running. Demo:https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5499880/165187948-... Would love any feedback and thoughts people have about Heroku, my thoughts above, and what we're building :) EDIT: Wow, just went from 11 -> 8 upvotes. I suppose they didn't like the astroturfing callout EDIT2: Render isn't who I'm talking about. They're great. |