|
|
|
|
|
by indigochill
1534 days ago
|
|
Free tiers are/should be a marketing tactic that gets people comfortable enough with your product that when it comes time to put money down, they put it on your thing rather than the competitor. It's when free tiers don't have a sufficient draw into a paid tier that you run into problems. Microsoft figured this out relatively early on during their monopoly lawsuit which they cleverly settled by donating a bunch of Microsoft products to schools so that the next generation of the workforce would grow up on Microsoft products and become commercial Microsoft users in the workforce (and I've seen Apple use this same approach since then). What was ostensibly seen as a punishment by the legal system simply entrenched their position further. And in gaming, there's an entire industry around "free to play" games that make billions of dollars, although I sincerely hope B2B tech doesn't take marketing inspiration from them. |
|
In return schools teach their students Microsoft products in school and you can't really beat the pricing. Because running your own infrastructure will be more expensive especially if your school isn't big enough to have it's own IT department. Prices are rising though because you can't license box versions anymore.
So you now have the choice of paying for Teams, SharePoint online and not using them and licensing and running your local file servers, AD etc. or switching more of your infrastructure to the cloud and increasing the lock-in.
This is really worrying to me, but from a cost perspective you can't really justify continue running a lot of infrastructure, especially if your local government doesn't have a lot of funds in the first place. I'd rather spend that money on hardware that the students and teachers can use than pay for servers and licenses.