|
|
|
|
|
by bradleyjg
1528 days ago
|
|
This is a commonly made point, but is misleading. The historical usage is for a hypothetical or unknown referent not a specific, known person. Furthermore, generic he has also been around for hundreds of years. So we should keep using that too, right? |
|
This seems less like a material distinction and more like something that transphobic people would bring up to support their ideology.
> Furthermore, generic he has also been around for hundreds of years. So we should keep using that too, right?
My point was that it isn't new or somehow "a gen Z thing", not "all old things are good"