|
|
|
|
|
by mcronce
1532 days ago
|
|
> This is a commonly made point, but is misleading. The historical usage is for a hypothetical or unknown referent not a specific, known person. This seems less like a material distinction and more like something that transphobic people would bring up to support their ideology. > Furthermore, generic he has also been around for hundreds of years. So we should keep using that too, right? My point was that it isn't new or somehow "a gen Z thing", not "all old things are good" |
|
No one has said anything about trans people, we were talking Gen z butchering the English language. Also, is it a disorder (“phobic”) or an ideology? Or do you not understand that distinction either?