[ricardobeat]

Mind expanding on your experience and how are websockets more reliable than SSE? one of the main benefits of SSE is reliability from running on plain HTTP.

[dnautics]

I've done both. One big one is Sse connections will eventually time out, and you WILL have to renegotiate, so there will be a huge latency spike on those events. They are easier in elixir than most pls, but honestly if you're using elixir, you might as well use phoenix's builtin we socket support.

[_clhx]

How is this different from websockets? They will eventually close for various reasons, sometimes in not obvious ways.

[bullen]

Not if you send "noop" messages.

[dnautics]

In my experience, sse times out way more than ws, even if you are always sending (I was streaming jpegs using sse).

[bullen]

I think it might be your ISP. For example one of my ISPs cut off my SSH connections no matter what I do. They simply dislike hanging SSH connections.

It's just random that your ISP like WebSockets more than long HTTP responses, and it can change in a heartbeat and for most people it will be different. As I said before 99,6% successful networking is an unheard of number for real-time multiplayer games.

I only care about that number, until you proove with hard stats and 350.000 real users from everywhere on the planet that WebSocket has 99,7% success rate, I'm not even going to flinch.

[dnautics]

It's not random. Having limited timeouts for http is policy set at often time several layers to prevent certain types of security regressions.

[bullen]

Ok, what security regressions?