[Temino]

I realized a few days ago that AR is more for robots and automation than for humans.

Imagine a company supporting ar in there product for maintenance.

They need to describe there Maschine to a point that AR can create an overlay and a step by step guide.

If you do this so that your technician can do it so can a robot.

If we ever make the effort to export 3d models from things and make them available, I believe we will see ML extracting repair steps and robots executing them before humans walking around with AR gogles.

[Grustaf]

Why would a robot need AR at all? And the challenge with building a repair robot is not to provide it with information about the item, it's in understanding the information and physically manipulating the item.

[Temino]

A robot doesn't need ar.

That's my point I tried making.

As soon as you actually use ar for people, at that point you have enough data for a robot to just do it instead.

As soon as you start creating ar support for it, you no longer need it.

[Grustaf]

I'm saying that this is not correct at all. There is no lack of data, but it's very very difficult to make a robot that can autonomously manipulate things well enough to repair things. It's not lacking data, it's about physical control.