|
|
|
|
|
|
by rsfern
1614 days ago
|
|
|
You shouldn’t distrust VAERS per se, but it’s purpose is not risk assessment. It’s purpose is surfacing rare side effects for further study. You don’t have to trust the drug co’s for that, we also have vaccine safety datalink system; so far the only notable side effect of the mRNA vaccines has been the myocarditis in younger people. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34477809/ Also your point about PCR testing is not accurate. |
|
|
Source on that? Because all graphs I've seen show impossible to miss fluorescence around 35 cycles and up.
AFAICT VSD only does specific research at their own behest and currently don't have a section on COVID-19 vaccines.
Btw your link is dead.
I had pericarditis and some immediate reaction, my cardiologist thinks it was partially intravenously applied. Looking at the data on severe reactions from where I live I've been able to obviously tell that CDC must have used incredible criteria for their numbers. At least initially, I stopped caring when it eventually became clear to me that we do not really want to know how many are harmed.
And from the perspective of everyone involved I understand it, I too want this to be over, I too want this to be a safe magic bullet. But seems to me somewhere between 1:1000-10000 have significant heart issues from the Pfizer vaccine, but when we were rolling it out the numbers were claimed to be 1 in 230M.