[guywhocodes]

> Also your point about PCR testing is not accurate.

Source on that? Because all graphs I've seen show impossible to miss fluorescence around 35 cycles and up.

AFAICT VSD only does specific research at their own behest and currently don't have a section on COVID-19 vaccines.

Btw your link is dead.

I had pericarditis and some immediate reaction, my cardiologist thinks it was partially intravenously applied. Looking at the data on severe reactions from where I live I've been able to obviously tell that CDC must have used incredible criteria for their numbers. At least initially, I stopped caring when it eventually became clear to me that we do not really want to know how many are harmed.

And from the perspective of everyone involved I understand it, I too want this to be over, I too want this to be a safe magic bullet. But seems to me somewhere between 1:1000-10000 have significant heart issues from the Pfizer vaccine, but when we were rolling it out the numbers were claimed to be 1 in 230M.

[rsfern]

The link isn’t dead for me, but I guess there’s no abstract on pubmed, sorry. This is the DOI link: https://DOI.org/10.1001/jama.2021.14808

It’s an editorial summarizing the first VSD report on Covid vaccine side effect research that I was describing (https://DOI.org/10.1001/jama.2021.15072)

I’m not going to argue that the US seemed to take longer and have worse communication about the myo/pericarditis issue than some other countries, but these things are being followed up on. The absolute timing I think is hard to discuss with a definite time frame

Here are some resources on PCR amplification:

- https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-critical-thinking...

- https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/cloning...