|
|
|
|
|
by lunias
1623 days ago
|
|
Speed limits make little sense to me... I think it should be referred to as a speed target; to imply that it is meant as both a minimum and a maximum. The real dangers are speed deltas in my opinion. Someone travelling below the speed limit can create just as many problems as someone going over the limit. I agree that we should look more closely at what these speed targets should be, but I'm not a fan of catering to the lowest common denominator exposed through testing... I feel like licensing and general requirements for operating a vehicle are too lax. For example, I put snow tires on every year, but I don't know anyone else who does. Should the speed target be based off of my braking distance or theirs? So many vehicles in the US are less than fit for the road (as are many drivers). Now if they actually started pulling people over for using their phones... That would help a lot and not require much thought to enforce. |
|
Agreed, and I've actually seen signs for both on some highways.
> I feel like licensing and general requirements for operating a vehicle are too lax.
Agreed here as well. I wouldn't be opposed to have driving tests more than once in a lifetime. But this is a tough issue to tackle because I don't think a majority of people would be on board with it, and the DMVs are already being strained.