|
|
|
|
|
|
by milkytron
1623 days ago
|
|
|
> I think it should be referred to as a speed target; to imply that it is meant as both a minimum and a maximum. Agreed, and I've actually seen signs for both on some highways. > I feel like licensing and general requirements for operating a vehicle are too lax. Agreed here as well. I wouldn't be opposed to have driving tests more than once in a lifetime. But this is a tough issue to tackle because I don't think a majority of people would be on board with it, and the DMVs are already being strained. |
|
|
I believe I've seen the same signs on some highways, but usually they're like 40 mph minimum with a 60 mph limit. Which leaves a large delta, especially when people actually go 70 mph.
> I wouldn't be opposed to have driving tests more than once in a lifetime. But this is a tough issue to tackle
Same and agreed. Due to the fact that most everyone in the US has to drive just to survive you can't easily raise the barrier to entry. I wish we could though... maybe it would help spur investment in public transportation.
I'd actually love it if each lane of the highway had an increasing speed target from right to left as a rule i.e. 60 in the right, 65 in the middle, and 70 on the left. In reality if everyone goes the same exact speed then lane changes become difficult.