|
|
|
|
|
|
by dirtyid
1644 days ago
|
|
|
>Citing Zenz per se does not make the the “Broad Daylight” less credible. Broad Daylight presumes Zenz conclusion of coerced labour as basis for rest of supply chain analysis. It can only be judged in that context, which makes it, and any research that use Zenz as starting point, less credible.>Citing Zenz per se does not make the the “Broad Daylight” less credible. On par =/= equal. HKFP better than epochetimes, but not by much. The bias of Bitterwinter/HKFP is presuming PRC branches are going off script when acting "two faced" that gets "disavowed" by HQ is the kind of face saving behavior that multinationals do to stay in good graces of east and west. What Intel is doing here. Publishers like HKFP and Bitterwinter bias is characterizing typical corporate doublespeak as unique Chinese misbehavior. |
|
|
A research could be inspired by Zenz, then went on to find independent evidence supporting the same conclusion (forced labor in Xinjiang).
Getting inspired by Zenz does not make subsequent research less credible.
You need to list specific flaws in the Broad Daylight report to discredit it.
> On par =/= equal. HKFP better than epochetimes, but not by much...
With the Reuters reporting [1] linked above which reports the same as HKFP, diverting the discussion on HKFP is a straw man.
[1]: https://www.reuters.com/article/china-xinjiang-hugo-boss-idI... "Chinese celebs, netizens slam 'two-faced' Hugo Boss over Xinjiang"
> The bias of Bitterwinter/HKFP is presuming PRC branches are going off script when acting "two faced" that gets "disavowed" by HQ...
The fact that the Chinese branch can go rogue against the global headquarter has been reported multiple times.
For an example in tech, see Arm China [2], where the damage to the headquarter is much larger than Hugo Boss or BCI.
[2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28329731 "Arm China Has Gone Rogue"