| > any research that use Zenz as starting point... A research could be inspired by Zenz, then went on to find independent evidence supporting the same conclusion (forced labor in Xinjiang). Getting inspired by Zenz does not make subsequent research less credible. You need to list specific flaws in the Broad Daylight report to discredit it. > On par =/= equal. HKFP better than epochetimes, but not by much... With the Reuters reporting [1] linked above which reports the same as HKFP, diverting the discussion on HKFP is a straw man. [1]: https://www.reuters.com/article/china-xinjiang-hugo-boss-idI... "Chinese celebs, netizens slam 'two-faced' Hugo Boss over Xinjiang" > The bias of Bitterwinter/HKFP is presuming PRC branches are going off script when acting "two faced" that gets "disavowed" by HQ... The fact that the Chinese branch can go rogue against the global headquarter has been reported multiple times. For an example in tech, see Arm China [2], where the damage to the headquarter is much larger than Hugo Boss or BCI. [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28329731 "Arm China Has Gone Rogue" |