| >On the basis of that alone, you're better off taking your chances on the vaccine Is it though? I may not be infected by covid and not be subjected to the risk, but if I get the vaccine then I'm definitely subjecting myself to the risk. x * (1/25000) vs 1.0 * (1/100000) If the probability of catching covid (x) is less than 25% then the risk of myocarditis would be greater from the vaccine, no? Edit: what happens when you get the vaccine and then get covid? Do the current figures include that? |
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-covid-cases-re...
Assuming a world population of 7.75 billion, that puts the estimated prevalence at about 3.5%.
However, that's using confirmed cases. Estimates of actual cases would put it at 4-10 times higher (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/burd... or https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/06/9645278...).
So that puts it at 14-35%, right around 25%.
Although that's over the last 21 months or so, it means you're more likely than not going to be infected with it in the next few years.