You responded to someone describing their experience with an aggressive “just do it and don’t bother people fine with wfh,” implying that the poster was somehow trying to encroach on your ability to WFH. They never said that.
You even express your frustration directly in a sibling comment below.
Pretending your comment wasn’t rude, especially after elsewhere expressing your explicit frustration, is only half-true at best.
"Encroach on your ability to WFH" - you perfectly summed up the reason for the vitriol from remote-only people, IMO:
They are fearful that people with your stance will give companies a better argument for less remote-work. It's one thing when executives talk about it, because they're "not on the ground" and "just want control" or "don't understand individual contributors", but when peers like you support non-100% remote, it's a real worrisome prospect for them.
Sure, but it’s also a worrisome prospect for those that have had serious issues with WFH for a company to decide to go all-remote. Still doesn’t give them the right to be assholes. :)
FYI, it also read as excessively dismissive, bordering on aggressive to me. There's plenty of ways to phrase your disagreement without invalidating the person you're talking to quite so much.
You assumed they didn't consider they could just do it themselves. The issue is motivation. Going to work helped motivate them do these other things. Biking to work seems less pointless than biking to nowhere because they need to get to work, the exercise is a secondary benefit.
Edit:
Recommending they find a coworking space they can bike to and work from could have been a nicer suggestion (assuming pandemic ever goes away)
You even express your frustration directly in a sibling comment below.
Pretending your comment wasn’t rude, especially after elsewhere expressing your explicit frustration, is only half-true at best.
Have a nice day. :)