|
|
|
|
|
by mbesto
1735 days ago
|
|
I'm being slightly facetious. I don't know why Mullvad issued a notice to talk about ownership, but I presume it was because they've gotten alot of M&A interest or it's a marketing move to garner trust from their client-base (i.e. others are getting distrust for selling). I know more examples of companies who publicly say they're not interested in selling that do than those that don't. In other words, why be public about it?[0] Clearly there is M&A interest for a company like this. Do you know any for-profit orgs that say publicly they aren't selling and actually don't? Most I know simply aren't public about it. [0] - Btw - one M&A trick to drive up a valuation is to say you're not for sale. So yes this heuristic is absolutely valid in that sense. |
|
> I don't know why Mullvad issued a notice to talk about ownership
The reason is probably because ExpressVPN was just bought by Kape. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28552731