|
|
|
|
|
by stevenjohns
1732 days ago
|
|
I feel like this is glancing over various points. Specifically that cows aren’t the only source of milk: sheep, goats, buffalo and horses have all been milked throughout history, and would have been the main source for milk in Rome. And it wasn’t historically looked down upon: major Abrahamic faiths venerated milk consumption. For some reason yogurt is also glanced over even though Oxygala (or something like it) would have definitely been consumed almost daily. It seems like this is a fairly Eurocentric view. Not even that, really, but a specific-period-of-time-in-Rome view. The Romans didn’t like butter… that’s about it. And they didn’t like it because it spoils too easily in their environment. Expanding that to dairy in general is quite a reach. Looking at what someone eats and picking on them for it still takes place in 2021 — try sending your kid with a whole cucumber to school. |
|
What I found really interesting is the premise that the article makes about spoilage. If dairy spoils in the warmer Mediterranean causing the inhabitants to find it unappealing, then why is it that the people living in hotter climate of India found dairy to be integral to their diet? Is it because because of Ghee which has a longer shelf life?
And Yogurt too - even today - integral to any number of Indian households.