[silicon2401]

Why does that need to be insulting? It's correct in that context. Only names of a certain format are valid inputs to their system. It's not a personal attack

[HWR_14]

It's the difference between saying "our system cannot handleyour name" and "your name is wrong". One is a limitation of a program, the other is dehumanizing.

[silicon2401]

What reasonable evidence do you have to think that "valid" in that context is saying your name is wrong, rather than that the system cannot handle it?

[HWR_14]

What makes you think I care what the author meant to say? I'm discussing how people read it.

[silicon2401]

I don't think we should care about people having such unreasonable interpretations. It's fair to expect adults to have enough emotional maturity to differentiate between the limitations of a website interface and a personal, targeted attack.

[HWR_14]

I don't think it's an unreasonable interpertation. The OP of this chain read it that way. I read it that way.

If there are two phrasings, and one is read correctly by everyone, and the other is read correctly by half the world, it's the first that is correct.

[silicon2401]

I have a strong hunch that you, OP, and me don't make everyone. I also don't accept your premise about interpreting a phrase. In different times, "everyone" would consider it correct to say things like race X is superior to race Y. Do you now hold that that claim would be correct too?