|
|
|
|
|
by durbleflorp
1784 days ago
|
|
Personally, I agree both parties are severely problematic, don't feel they're equally problematic. I vote for third party candidates with policy I actually agree with when it isn't going to negatively affect me or others when they inevitably lose. The sad reality is that FPTP makes strategic voting necessary if you want to have any kind of power. In addition to the issues you mentioned we need score or ranked choice voting so we can begin a transition towards actual accountibility, and hopefully eventually a more diverse set of parties. Voting for a third party candidate is effectively throwing your vote away in a protest no one will ever hear in a FPTP system. |
|
Voting for a 3rd party is not a de facto protest vote, nor is it throwing it away in any case. What power do you get for voting for a party not aligned with your interests? If a third party should achieve a 5% vote, they are eligible for federal funds and would have a big impact on ballot access nationally.
That may not be very persuasive to you (based on conversations I've had with others who felt similarly), but I no longer need regret voting strategically (which actually feels like throwing my vote away).