|
|
|
|
|
|
by nescioquid
1783 days ago
|
|
|
> Voting for a third party candidate is effectively throwing your vote away in a protest no one will ever hear in a FPTP system. Voting for a 3rd party is not a de facto protest vote, nor is it throwing it away in any case. What power do you get for voting for a party not aligned with your interests? If a third party should achieve a 5% vote, they are eligible for federal funds and would have a big impact on ballot access nationally. That may not be very persuasive to you (based on conversations I've had with others who felt similarly), but I no longer need regret voting strategically (which actually feels like throwing my vote away). |
|
|
I was only able to do that because I knew my vote wouldn't ultimately matter in my state's contest though.
In score or ranked choice voting I could both articulate my actual preference in a way that was publicly visible and still make the strategic vote(s) I needed to get the least bad of likely options.
FPTP is one of the least expressive voting systems you could have, and it is objectively terrible for third parties. This isn't a controversial opinion, it's what that vast majority of political scientists agree with.
Third parties are irrelevant in American politics and will continue to be unless we change our voting system (and campaign finance).