|
|
|
|
|
by staticassertion
1796 days ago
|
|
What's in a name? Really, is "Amazon Virtual Servers" much better than "Elastic Compute" ? Maybe slightly. But at the end of the day you have to go look at it and see wtf that means no matter what, and the 'elastic' verbiage is fairly consistent across AWS products. IAM is similarly not that bad - Identity Access Management pretty much tells me what it is. When we have a field where things are named in extremely unclear ways - kubernetes, docker, kafka, prometheus, etc etc etc - these really don't seem that bad by comparison. |
|
Boring descriptive names are better, but don't look as good when marketing the product (I'd assume).