|
|
|
|
|
by lrdswrk00
1793 days ago
|
|
That’s up to the people occupying California at the time. Humanity is doomed. I’m not saying we should accelerate it by leaning into YOLO. But along with accepting our own personal mortality we might consider it’s time to socially accept our species mortality. We don’t need to solve this problem right now and any work towards a solution isn’t guaranteed to last beyond our lifetimes, for numerous reasons outside our control. Science provides the best model for understanding what economic activity our environment can sustain. Maybe it’s time to be the exceptional and gritty people we tell stories about being and rather than solve California’s eventual problem, try to hold it off by reducing or eliminating markets for bullshit. Or we can pretend we’ll engineer our way out of a problem we have no idea how much time we really have to solve and cross our fingers like it’s a football game and feudal market economics thinking we’re simulating chaotic reality when it’s obvious political collusion and protectionism are occurring. I wonder which way we’ll go |
|
The general premise (and Taleb didn't come up with this) is that for a phenomenon with no natural lifespan, you should assume you're halfway through its actual lifespan.
Biologically modern humans are about 100,000 years old, so I put our tombstone at 102021 A.D.
Now that could be wrong... in either direction! But I'm inclined to plan for the future such that we're as comfortable as we can be for the next hundred millennia.