|
|
|
|
|
by bambax
1793 days ago
|
|
> Most public company data is unstructured and textual. This is surprising to me. Wouldn't it be possible to make a very short list of, say, 12 blunt questions that would help flag fraud? Of course the company could be lying in the answers. (If it was found to be lying in any one answer then it would automatically be flagged as "high risk".) But this may not even be needed, since what you seem to be saying is that the information about fraud is there in plain sight, yet hard to see, because it is drowned in fluff and periphrases. Is there an opportunity for a private company, say a rating company, to make and distribute such a questionnaire? Or does it already exist in some form? |
|
There are certainly some sorts of transactions that are much more risky than others - so having an easy source for these transactions would be useful (and we'd built it into our models). But often the signals are more subtle. Companies with overly aggressive accounting policies across the board tend to have completely different undisclosed problems. Since there are estimates and judgement involved in all areas of accounting looking at the aggregate impact of all policies can be important.
On adding more information - The SEC adopted rules to modernize disclosures of risk factors in 2020, requiring a summary risk factor disclosure if the risk factor section exceeds 15 pages (https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-192).