[bambax]

> or it if would just add one more data point for people to (not) read?

Intuitively fraud should be correlated to specific accounting practices, or maybe simply to the number of hours billed by the auditors, who are likely to charge more if the work is more "complicated"... Disclosing the amount paid to auditors could be one of those questions.

An analogy would be the "Joel Test" (2000) [1]; checklists in general, and direct questions, are much more revealing than blurb written by the target or a communications agency.

My two cents.

[1] https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2000/08/09/the-joel-test-12-s...