|
|
|
|
|
by scatters
1861 days ago
|
|
High fares (and they aren't that high) aren't a result of privatization; they're because of a lack of subsidy. In the UK, despite the obvious environmental benefits, subsidizing rail is politically awkward because it's regressive. |
|
People do complain about the fares but the trains are full so it's questionable whether they are too high.
If I'm looking at it from an environmental perspective I'd argue the other options (cars, planes) are too cheap.