A jury trial is not science. Juries tend to be swayed by emotions and sticking it go big companies not right. (I can't offer you anything better to replace them though )
A publication from the EPA citing science, without linking the studies, is also not science.
I honestly do not trust the EPA to do a fair review here, given how deep the connections between big business and government are. It's extremely naïve to assume this was a completely unbiased, purely scientific undertaking.
Your point is fair too, that juries tend to be swayed by emotion. Unfortunately, unless a true third party does an actual scientific review, I'll be avoiding the stuff.
A direct causal relationship is unlikely, however, the link between increased cyanobacteria in our waters and glyphosate spraying is possible and being studied elsewhere.
New Brunswick also carried on with heavy spraying of DDT into the 1980s stopping much later than most places.
There have been more diseased moose sightings in recent years too.
What about the possibility of contaminated seafood?
So many possibilities. Quite scary with no concrete answers.