[DetroitThrow]

>That only makes sense if you agree with the open source foundation definition of restrictive.

I think Timescale employees should remember to preface "This is our belief on the definition of restrictive" when describing the license as more open than open source licenses, given much of the community might disagree (sometimes vehemently) about that take.

[akulkarni]

Totally fair. My initial comment was a little rushed. :-)

[detaro]

Or scope it as "less restrictive for most users" or something along those lines.

[cevian]

That may indeed have been more accurate. But this is a HN comment thread after all, we can't capture all subtleties of a very complex debate. :)