|
|
|
|
|
by stygiansonic
1923 days ago
|
|
From the article: “In other words, this had nothing to do with code obfuscation or minification. My extension would still include the violating strings even if it were published without processing the source code in any way, simply because Lodash explicitly declares Unicode characters.” |
|
Random binary strings looks a lot more like obfuscated code when it's minified. The easier to make it for the reviewer to understand what the code does, the less likely it is to get taken down.
At the end of the day, the goal is to put a stop to extensions being bought off and tracking code being added to them in an obfuscated way.