|
|
|
|
|
by ehsankia
1923 days ago
|
|
While it's true that the part that was tagged happened to be the Unicode declaration bit, it's still not a proof that the unminified version would've gotten hit too, especially once you have the full variable names and comments explaining what the code does. Random binary strings looks a lot more like obfuscated code when it's minified. The easier to make it for the reviewer to understand what the code does, the less likely it is to get taken down. At the end of the day, the goal is to put a stop to extensions being bought off and tracking code being added to them in an obfuscated way. |
|