|
|
|
|
|
by idclip
1954 days ago
|
|
Not trying to put you down. I see the thinking behind your rationale, it is also somewhat detached from human emotional and political reality. Being exposed to the atrocities of /most/ (im no expert) modern day monarchs and being an arab in the middle east, i find it REALLY hard to call what they do cute, or something math and money could fix. These problems, even dänmarks, evolved through strife, injustice and corruption. Monarchies are necessary as-long as the region needs them .. i see politics more like an evolutionary process where monarchy is part of a nations dev stages. I actually wish you were right. |
|
We now have a Queen, and the role of the monarchy is entirely ceremonial.
Back in 1849 the Danish king signed the constitution, making the role of the king ceremonial, and giving us democracy.
Sure, this was in the aftermath of the French revolution. And hadn't the Danish king signed away his power we would likely have had a revolution.
Yes, monarchy in it's original/natural form is horrific. It's essentially a dictatorship, no different. But I'd money and a ceremonial role can grease the wheels for a peaceful transition is that so bad?
In Britain they don't have a constitution the same way. But I see many events throughout british history where the crown gradually signed away power.