|
|
|
|
|
|
by jopsen
1959 days ago
|
|
|
In Denmark we have a constitutional monarchy... And while the constitution mentions the "King" many places. We now have a Queen, and the role of the monarchy is entirely ceremonial. Back in 1849 the Danish king signed the constitution, making the role of the king ceremonial, and giving us democracy. Sure, this was in the aftermath of the French revolution. And hadn't the Danish king signed away his power we would likely have had a revolution. Yes, monarchy in it's original/natural form is horrific. It's essentially a dictatorship, no different.
But I'd money and a ceremonial role can grease the wheels for a peaceful transition is that so bad? In Britain they don't have a constitution the same way. But I see many events throughout british history where the crown gradually signed away power. |
|
|
Not saying its bad, just saying they wont do it. Theyre already rich beyond imagining- sadism and abuse are rampant, and the public doesnt seem to care.
Like seriously, how much cash will it take to convince the saudis to go ceremonial? Meanwhile another gay person is hung and a dissident is assassinated. That all said .. seems to be what the region “wants” - displeasure isnt high enough yet for regular folk to demand change.
In arabic there is a saying “the people earn the ruler they deserve”.
Beyond the short term moral qualm .. its just a step in the development of these countries - it could - and i was - worse. Better wiser days will come.