Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by NoodleIncident 1964 days ago
Aren't you describing Parler's failed attempt at pretending they moderate their content?
1 comments

By definition, if they pretended, it means they were not serious about getting to a solution that the average person would find reasonable

Note that it doesnt mean aws or gcp or cnn had to agree, it just means that it really resembled the process that we have for the us court system

In fact something well implemented would potentially threaten (and by definition, by attacked by) the twitters fb, aws , etc, because it would become a more reliable predictor of content moderation than what currently exists via ToS. It would effectively obsolte catchall ToS, and decidely be a vote against centralized control

We can likely agree that the words "well implemented" and "parler" do not belong in the same sentence