|
|
|
|
|
by IG_Semmelweiss
1965 days ago
|
|
By definition, if they pretended, it means they were not serious about getting to a solution that the average person would find reasonable Note that it doesnt mean aws or gcp or cnn had to agree, it just means that it really resembled the process that we have for the us court system In fact something well implemented would potentially threaten (and by definition, by attacked by) the twitters fb, aws , etc, because it would become a more reliable predictor of content moderation than what currently exists via ToS. It would effectively obsolte catchall ToS, and decidely be a vote against centralized control We can likely agree that the words "well implemented" and "parler" do not belong in the same sentence |
|