Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by jumpman500 1990 days ago
Same. I can't use Safari without Ublock Origin. The web is a horrible place without it.

[1] https://github.com/el1t/uBlock-Safari/issues/158

2 comments

I’ve been using safari + Wipr and I haven’t noticed any big difference.
I will actually second this. Wipr is really good.

Also, generally speaking, the way Safari implements this means that the extension passes on the block list to the browser and Safari itself implements the blocking. This means,

1. It is more private since the extension does not have access to your webpage. 2. It is faster because Safari can do it natively and it is not done in JavaScript.

Too true. I have Safari with 1Blocker / Wipr, through a PiHole that uses NextDNS for DNS resolution. All other browsers feel like wading through treacle. Whenever I'm forced to use Chrome on someone else's device I'm gobsmacked at how anyone could put up with something so slow and clunky.
for what it's worth I've got a Pi-Hole running on my local network instead of in-browser adblock, and it's pretty good, and before that i had some success with 1Blocker, which IIRC uses the same lists as uBlock Origin.
YMMV (probably depends on the subset of the web that one visits) but I've had good luck with Wipr under Safari. Once in a while something slips through but it's generally ~99% as effective as uBO when it comes to visible ads. The difference is small enough that I'm not inclined to use a different browser.