[jariel]

"Netflix is $10/m, so why would I buy Mailbrew"

No, that's not the argument being made though.

The argument is 'why is a team of 3 paying 3x$10 to 'schedule meetings'. There's only 3 people, i.e. a reasonable questioning of the value being made.

Honestly, $10 is not that much, but why on earth would it be needed is a fair question.

[zimbatm]

That's not really the argument either.

If you cost $100/hour, it only takes 6 minutes of saved time per month to pay back for it. Plus lost opportunity if a potential customer doesn't schedule the call with you. Reducing the friction to talk to customers is pretty big in my books.

The question is if the value you get out of the service is higher than what you pay for.

[worik]

Depends how confident you are of the cash flow.

100/h is noce. It is so much nocer if it is going for a year, decade.

If you are worth $100/h but are not getting paid - that is you have cash flow problems, then these are a lot of SaaS to be paying for.

That is a oversimplification but it is (almost) all about cash flow in a small business just getting going

[jacobr1]

I've been Calendly user for a while, which addresses the same niche. It doesn't replace scheduling with your internal peers. What it does is enable scheduling with people outside your company without doing any multi-stage dance of listing potential times and getting confirmation, sending out an invite, rescheduling because the even though you clearly stated it, the recipient didn't account for the timezone, dealing with schedule changes and more. My primary use case is coordination with interview candidates, vendors, and customers. A service like this replaces an executive assistant (at least the scheduling part) rather than gsuite.

[kyawzazaw]

They might be scheduling meeting with clients?