[ncmncm]

Motions of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn? Opinions of enthusiasts with pet theories? What are you talking about?

You illustrate my point better than I could ever explain.

[nl]

ncmncm>>> ... Applied to moons of Jupiter and Saturn ... [implications that there is something scientists are missing about "material leaving the poles"]

matthewdgreen>> ... I have no idea what the situation is with current theories on the motion of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn....

ncmncm> Motions of the moons of Jupiter and Saturn? Opinions of enthusiasts with pet theories? What are you talking about?

It was pretty clear to me what @matthewdgreen was talking about.

[ncmncm]

Although clearly nothing about what I wrote.

[nl]

He addressed exactly what you wrote.

(Unless you mean whatever your pet theory is about gravity or magmatism or whatever, and he addressed why that isn't worth discussing too).

[ncmncm]

You illustrate my point, as well, and so forcefully!

Electro-"magma"-tism has not been anybody's pet theory for going on 150 years.

[nl]

Congratulations?

I think that perhaps you think people are paying a lot more attention to your theory than you think.

We are talking about scientific consensus, and you seem to be talking about something else.

[ncmncm]

You have no faint idea what you are talking about. I don't have any "theory".

Why do you reply to things that you cannot even bring yourself to take the time to read and comprehend? Who do you imagine you are fooling?

[matthewdgreen]

Please try to explain.