(Unless you mean whatever your pet theory is about gravity or magmatism or whatever, and he addressed why that isn't worth discussing too).
Electro-"magma"-tism has not been anybody's pet theory for going on 150 years.
I think that perhaps you think people are paying a lot more attention to your theory than you think.
We are talking about scientific consensus, and you seem to be talking about something else.
Why do you reply to things that you cannot even bring yourself to take the time to read and comprehend? Who do you imagine you are fooling?
(Unless you mean whatever your pet theory is about gravity or magmatism or whatever, and he addressed why that isn't worth discussing too).