|
|
|
|
|
by spoonjim
2009 days ago
|
|
First of all, video conferencing is one of the most challenging software products to deliver, at the latencies that people expect and the price they're typically willing to pay. It's not a CRUD app. Second, F, A, A, G, and M do provide rock solid video conferencing. Apple being the most rock solid of all of them, but limited to Apple devices. |
|
The smartest software engineers are in FAAGM, or so I've been told?
> Second, F, A, A, G, and M do provide rock solid video conferencing.
If they have solid products, then how did a no name company beat them?
FWIW I'll have to disagree with you on 'solid products'. My wife runs a learning center that went virtual. I evaluated very product that came up on Google search. It was a tight choice between Zoom and Skype, but chose Skype because I felt a big name would have better service. Microsoft kept locking our accounts and doing other shenanigans. Bit the bullet, paid for Zoom and no problems.